SLA vs SLS Printing: Which is Right for You?
Share
If you've ever felt like you need a dictionary just to browse 3D printers, you're not alone. When I first stepped into this world, my head was spinning with acronyms: FDM, DLP, SLM, and the two heavy-hitters we're talking about today, SLA and SLS. It’s easy to look at the stunning results of these technologies and assume they’re interchangeable. But the truth is, they are fundamentally different, built for entirely different purposes.
Choosing between them is less about which one is "better" and more about which one is the right tool for the job you have in mind. So, let's cut through the jargon. In this article, I'll break down the real-world differences in the SLA vs SLS printing debate to help you figure out which technology is the perfect match for your project.
SLA vs SLS Printing: Which Should You Choose?
So, which technology should you choose? The answer depends entirely on your priority. If you need stunning, injection-mold-like surface finishes and intricate details for visual prototypes or models, SLA is your champion. If you need robust, durable, and complex functional parts that can withstand mechanical stress, SLS is the undisputed winner.
Think of it this way: SLA is the sculptor, obsessed with fine lines, smooth curves, and aesthetic perfection. SLS is the engineer, focused on strength, structural integrity, and creating complex, functional geometries that are impossible to make any other way. One creates the beautiful prototype you show to investors; the other creates the durable end-use part that goes into the machine.
How They Work: SLA vs SLS Printing
While both technologies use a laser to build parts layer by layer, how they use that laser is what sets them apart. This fundamental difference in process is the source of all their unique strengths and weaknesses.
SLA (Stereolithography): The Art of Curing
SLA was the very first 3D printing technology, and it's still the king of surface finish. It works by using an ultraviolet (UV) laser to draw on a vat of liquid photopolymer resin. Where the laser hits the resin, it hardens, or "cures," creating a solid layer. The build platform then moves down slightly, a new coat of resin sweeps over the part, and the laser goes to work on the next layer. This continues until the model is complete.

SLS (Selective Laser Sintering): The Power of Sintering
SLS, on the other hand, works with a bed of fine polymer powder, typically nylon. A powerful laser heats (or "sinters") the powder, fusing the particles together to form a solid layer. The machine then spreads a new, thin layer of powder across the top, and the laser sinters the next cross-section of the object. This process repeats until the part is finished, completely encased in the unsintered powder.

SLA vs SLS Printing:Resolution vs. Durability
The real discussion of SLA vs SLS printing comes down to what you value most in your final part. Is it looks, or is it toughness?
When Detail and Surface Finish are Everything (SLA)
Because SLA uses a liquid resin and a highly precise laser, it can produce parts with incredibly fine details and ultra-smooth surfaces. The layer lines can be virtually invisible, resulting in a finish that looks almost like a traditional injection-molded object.
This is why SLA is the go-to choice for applications where aesthetics are critical. Think:
- 
High-fidelity visual prototypes
 - 
Detailed miniatures and character models
 - 
Jewelry casting patterns
 - 
Dental and medical models
 
For a company like i3dfigure, which specializes in creating hyper-realistic custom 3D statues from photos, SLA is the only choice. They use industrial-grade SLA printers to capture the subtle details that make a person's face unique. The final product, crafted from a unique polymer clay material, requires a master model with flawless surface quality—something only SLA can provide.
When Strength and Functionality Reign Supreme (SLS)
SLS parts are known for their exceptional mechanical properties. The sintered nylon is strong, durable, and resistant to impact and wear. While the surface has a slightly grainy, matte finish, the parts are tough enough for real-world use.
A major advantage of SLS is its freedom of design. Because the unsintered powder surrounds the part during printing, it acts as its own support structure. This means you can create incredibly complex geometries—interlocking parts, internal channels, and moving components—all printed in a single piece without the need for support structures that have to be removed later.
This makes SLS ideal for:
- 
Functional prototypes for form, fit, and function testing
 - 
Low-volume end-use parts
 - 
Complex designs like housings, jigs, and fixtures
 - 
Parts that need to be durable and lightweight (e.g., in aerospace and motorsports)
 
SLA vs SLS Printing: Workflow and Materials
Beyond the final part quality, the day-to-day experience of using these machines is vastly different.
Materials and Cost
- 
SLA: Uses liquid resins, which come in a wide variety including standard, tough, flexible, and castable options. Resins can be expensive and require careful handling due to their chemical nature. The ongoing cost of resin and the vats can add up.
 - 
SLS: Primarily uses nylon (like PA11, PA12), often available in black or white. While the raw material cost per kilogram can be high, the ability to "nest" dozens of parts in the build chamber and reuse unsintered powder makes it very cost-effective for producing multiple parts at once.
 
Post-Processing
This is a huge point of distinction in the SLA vs SLS printing experience.
- 
SLA: The workflow is... messy. After printing, the part needs to be washed in a solvent (like isopropyl alcohol) to remove excess sticky resin. Then, it requires a final post-curing cycle in a UV chamber to achieve its optimal strength. This multi-step process requires gloves, safety glasses, and good ventilation.
 - 
SLS: The workflow is much simpler and cleaner. You just remove the finished part from the block of powder and brush or blast it clean. This "de-powdering" process is quick and easy, with no chemicals involved. For a business producing many parts, this streamlined workflow is a massive advantage.
 
Conclusion: It's a Partnership, Not a Competition
So, which is right for you? As we've seen, it’s not about one being definitively better. The SLA vs SLS printing technologies are partners in the world of additive manufacturing, each with a distinct and vital role.
If you are a product designer who needs a beautiful model for a photoshoot, an artist like the team at i3dfigure who needs to capture every nuance of a human face, or a jeweler creating master patterns, SLA is your tool. It delivers beauty and precision in a way that is unmatched.
However, if you are an engineer who needs to test a snap-fit enclosure, a manufacturer creating a custom jig, or a designer building a drone body with complex internal structures, SLS is the clear choice. It delivers strength, durability, and a design freedom that unlocks new engineering possibilities.
The best way to choose is to look at your project and ask a simple question: "Am I trying to create something that looks perfect, or something that works perfectly?" Once you have that answer, your choice between these two incredible technologies becomes crystal clear.